[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Jun 12 20:56:20 UTC 2018
12. Jun 2018 13:22 by marc.gemis at gmail.com <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
> How do people in GIS know how many square meter of forest there is in
> a country based on OSM-data ?
I would start from something like: total area of area covered by
landuse=forest and natural=wood
after excluding very small areas.
> Is the data suited for that ?
Depends on (a) where (b) what kind of accuracy is needed, forest in many regions
are unmapped or partially mapped.
> How can I find those places with OSM data ?
What you exactly want to find?
> I thought I had an answer for all the above questions when
> natural=wood, landuse=forest, landcover=trees where used "properly".
No, you cant. As there are conflicting tagging methods
natural=wood, landuse=forest, landcover=trees are effectively synonymous.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest> for details.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging