[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Telecom local netwoks

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Jun 12 23:12:25 UTC 2018


On 13/06/18 07:51, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
>
>
> On 13 June 2018 at 06:54, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com 
> <mailto:fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Warin,
>
>     2018-06-12 11:52 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>     <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
>
>
>         What about calling them an 'exchange' ... though it could be
>         confused with money - foreign currency trading etc.
>          So umm 'communication exchange' ?
>
>
>     Exchange is a good input, thank you
>
>     telecom=exchange can't really be confused with
>     amenity=bureau_de_change can you ?
>     This would be shorter to type than
>     telecom=telecommunication_exchange or even
>     telecom=telephone_exchange and less redundant with key name "telecom"
>     We can think about telecom=exchange_point to meet consistency with
>     telecom=connection_point
>
>     I would really enjoy a consensus on this
>
>
> Yep, telecom=exchange works for me :-)

Works for me too... but don't be too hasty adopting one of 'my' ideas. 
Lets let others (and me) contemplate it for a while?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/f2b2e7e8/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list