[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Telecom local netwoks
61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Jun 12 23:12:25 UTC 2018
On 13/06/18 07:51, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On 13 June 2018 at 06:54, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
> <mailto:fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Warin,
> 2018-06-12 11:52 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
> What about calling them an 'exchange' ... though it could be
> confused with money - foreign currency trading etc.
> So umm 'communication exchange' ?
> Exchange is a good input, thank you
> telecom=exchange can't really be confused with
> amenity=bureau_de_change can you ?
> This would be shorter to type than
> telecom=telecommunication_exchange or even
> telecom=telephone_exchange and less redundant with key name "telecom"
> We can think about telecom=exchange_point to meet consistency with
> I would really enjoy a consensus on this
> Yep, telecom=exchange works for me :-)
Works for me too... but don't be too hasty adopting one of 'my' ideas.
Lets let others (and me) contemplate it for a while?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging