[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jun 13 09:49:51 UTC 2018


13. Jun 2018 11:47 by dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>:


> 2018-06-13 11:42 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> >:
>
>>           
>>
>>> I'm fine that all of those are called forest. But again that does not
>>> help to exclude the one I have shown you in Waasmunster.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Exclude landuse=residential areas.
>>
>
>
> there are residential plots in actual, "true" forests though.




Can you give an example photo of something that would be correctly  tagged

landuse=residential and is in "true" forest?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/d3009897/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list