[Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Wed Jun 13 10:39:34 UTC 2018


From: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2018 19:49
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Cc: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] The endless debate about "landcover" as a top-level tag

 

13. Jun 2018 11:36 by marc.gemis at gmail.com <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com> :

And landuse=grass doesn't make any sense at all. I'm not aware of any place where "grass" would be an appropiate land*use*.

And that is why landuse=grass is used to map landcover - not land use.

 

https://i.chzbgr.com/full/9175618304/hD5996842/

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/9d5bf4c3/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list