[Tagging] RFC: amenity=waiting_room and amenity=waiting_area

osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Wed Jun 13 11:37:33 UTC 2018

These both look pretty straight forward. I don’t see anything objectionable at first glance.


It might be interesting to explore how these interact with public_transport=platform. (e.g. train station, you got the platform edge, and behind that you have benches or individual seats along most of the platform, does the qualify as a waiting area? What about if there are no benches/chairs, is it still a waiting area?)


It might also be interesting to explore how you can indicate, beyond just being near it, what (separately mapped) service/event/thing you are waiting for at that area.


From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2018 20:45
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: [Tagging] RFC: amenity=waiting_room and amenity=waiting_area


I am asking for your comments on 









Please preferably comment on the discussion pages of the proposals.


Thank you,


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/aab8a707/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list