[Tagging] RFC: amenity=waiting_room and amenity=waiting_area

osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Wed Jun 13 13:04:59 UTC 2018

I would go for waiting_room=yes/no


And if we have waiting_room=foo/bar subtypes (no idea what subtypes there may be) for amenity=waiting_room in the future, then this naturally also applies to waiting_room tags on other features with any value other than no implying that there is a waiting room.


So you could have on its own node:






waiting_room=foo (implies waiting_room=yes)



From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2018 22:30
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] RFC: amenity=waiting_room and amenity=waiting_area


I had forgotten to name the property for things that provide a waiting room. Current proposal is "has_waiting_room" (it is less ambiguous than "waiting_room=*" which might also be used for subtypes, but it isn't how we usually operate). Please comment on this as well (same for the waiting area).




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/d68e8d67/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list