[Tagging] I can't support transit:lanes

[Paul Johnson]

So how is this different from placement=transition, then?

On Jun 13, 2018 01:04, <osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:

No you don’t.



transit:lanes describes how the lanes from the end of one way connect to
the end of another way in the direction of traffic flow.



For each pair of from/to ways, there is going to be exactly one node where
they connect. That is your via node.



*From:* Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, 13 June 2018 08:46
*To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>

*Subject:* Re: [Tagging] I can't support transit:lanes



You'd have more than one via way for the transit:lanes relation.



On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 01:11 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
wrote:


11. Jun 2018 23:02 by baloo at ursamundi.org:

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018, 23:43 Bryan Housel <bhousel at gmail.com> wrote:

The only way I’ll be able to support lane transitions would be as a
relation that has similar semantics to turn restrictions.. from/via/to.
Keep it simple (no multi via ways please).  This is already an understood
way of tagging things that connect 2 ways.



Driveway in the middle of a lane transition with turn restrictions.  What
now?



No problem? Why it would be an issue?

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180613/9b67e53e/attachment.html>