[Tagging] `amenity=shelter` implies `building=yes`?

Johnparis okosm at johnfreed.com
Sun Jun 17 07:46:57 UTC 2018

Agree with the notion that building is implied. In France, public transit
shelters are often included in the cadastral information, and they wind up
being tagged as  building=yes + wall=no (through the import) or as
building=roof (after verification).


I can imagine a shelter that's not a building (a partial cave, for
instance), but you are asking about implied values. I would say
amenity=shelter + building=no would need to be specified.


On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>

> On 06/16/2018 11:45 PM, Bryan Housel wrote:
> > Does `amenity=shelter` imply `building=yes`?
> If this is for bus stop/transit shelters, it would imply building=roof
> at minimum. The shelters here usually have three walls (sometimes only
> one wall) with the fourth side being open to the street, plus a canopy
> to protect from rain.
> --
> Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
> http://www.rantroulette.com
> http://www.skqrecordquest.com
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180617/6b6be697/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list