[Tagging] drop covered=booth?
pla16021 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 23 18:08:28 UTC 2018
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Bryan Housel <bhousel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Somebody has already posted a picture to the list of a public phone with
> no hood, no booth, and no cover, so
> > adding booth=yes to all phones could be an error.
> Are you being deliberately obtuse?
I am not being deliberately obtuse. Accidentally obtuse, perhaps.
What you wrote was this:
We'll replace all instances of covered=booth with covered=yes
I don't see the point of that if we're trying to lose covered=* on phone
booths. I thought
moving to booth=* was to avoid having covered=* for phones. If it has a
covered so you don't need to tag it as covered. So what am I missing?
and add a booth=yes to any features that don't already have a booth tag.”
Obviously I parsed it wrong. I parsed it as I split it above, two
sequential and independent
actions. I wasn't expecting short-circuit evaluation of that particular
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging