[Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?
osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Mon Mar 12 18:23:59 UTC 2018
Actually, that can easily happen if you have 1½ but some software wants to convert it to simple ASCII and doesn't add a space between the 1 and 1/2 when converting the ½. While if the original text already is "1 1/2" this doesn't happen.
Obviously, in a perfect world, where everything is Unicode and stays Unicode, I would agree that using ½ is better than 1/2. Unfortunately, we still have to often assume that a string will get converted from Unicode into ASCII or some specific ANSI codepage.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Hain <andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2018 03:16
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?
>
> Unicode fractions have an important advantage: they can’t run into a
> previous number, 1½ rather than 11/2.
>
> --
> Andrew
>
> ________________________________________
> From: James <james2432 at gmail.com>
> Sent: 12 March 2018 15:43:33
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> Subject: [Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?
>
> https://i.imgur.com/eigT5hX_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=
> medium
>
> How should this be tagged in housenumber? Using unicode ( ½ ) or
> ASCII( 1/2 )?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list