[Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at gmail.com
Fri Mar 16 21:45:03 UTC 2018
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:26:27 -0400
Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
> I can understand the desire for distinct tagging.
>
> Certainly, it's much tougher to navigate a field of blowdown / prone
> forest like
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14738421885/
> than it is to walk through a standing forest.
Also - it may be useful for orientation and during hiking trip one may
prefer to route going through existing forest rather area where forest
was destroyed.
> Nevertheless, they are both landuse=forest (if managed for forestry)
Many of areas that may be tagged this way are not managed for
forestry but in protected areas.
Areas managed for forestry are typically cleaned-up and replanted
relatively quickly.
Note that typical usage and interpretation of landuse=forest is
"area covered by trees" not "area managed for forestry" (though I
know that there are competing approaches - see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest ).
More information about the Tagging
mailing list