[Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 17 07:44:10 UTC 2018
sent from a phone
> On 16. Mar 2018, at 22:47, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would not expect area where no plant is higher than 50 cm to be
> described as forest. I think that using "landcover=trees" would be
> misleading in this case.
tree is about species, not about age or height
Would you call a baby “human”?
Cheers,
Martin
More information about the Tagging
mailing list