[Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 17 07:44:10 UTC 2018



sent from a phone

> On 16. Mar 2018, at 22:47, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would not expect area where no plant is higher than 50 cm to be
> described as forest. I think that using "landcover=trees" would be
> misleading in this case.



tree is about species, not about age or height 

Would you call a baby “human”?

Cheers,
Martin 


More information about the Tagging mailing list