[Tagging] Historic building usage

Johnparis okosm at johnfreed.com
Thu Mar 29 08:05:00 UTC 2018


Interesting. Musée d'Orsay in Paris offers another possibility:
building=disused:train_station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2853923

... as well as tourism=museum (reflecting the current use)

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org>
wrote:

> On 28.03.2018 23:20, Dave F wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I've a building to tag which used to be a train_station but currently has
>> a different use.
>>
>
> The building=train_station tag remains, since it describes the building
> type, independent of the current usage.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic
>>
>
> If you consider it of historic value you can add the tag, however it is a
> bit vague.
> If it is protected, heritage=* would be used, which allows to give details
> about the protection status.
>
> This page recommends historic=building, but I don't see how that's
>> beneficial. It can't be tagged to describe it's historic use. Building=*
>> should be used to describe what it is now.
>>
>
> No, building=* remains as the original type. You can add building:use=*
> for the current use.
>
> Wouldn't historic:building=* be better?
>>
>
> not necessary as the above covers the case.
>
> Refs:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180329/2becd22b/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list