[Tagging] Is it possible to have highway=unclassified with ref tag?

Erkin Alp Güney erkinalp9035 at gmail.com
Wed May 9 08:38:42 UTC 2018


> Road level sounds to me like how high it is. Or on which level in a
> complex crossing with fly-overs and stuff. 
> Beside that, would it be a problem to add a key for generic road
> classification while still keeping the old values? Users could use the
> generic classification by preference, and default to the older tags.
> (I'm not voting, just thinking loud)

No, road_level is an administrative level like admin_level is to places.
It is not to be confused with level=## and layer=## tags.

There are 6 different tiers of classified roads in Russia: M, R,
national A, provincial A, K, provincial minor. In road_level system, you
can express them as M=0, R=1, national A=2, provincial A=3, K=4,
minor=5. This system also allows non-primary motorways, which are not
expressible in current tagging scheme, (such as metropolitan motorways
in Spain) as you can combine highway=motorway with road_level=## tag.

It can also be generalised to railways. railway=rail where road_level
corresponds to

0=high speed railroad (vmax>250km/h, no level crossings, fully
signalled), 1=passenger-rated mainline, 2=freight-rated mainline,
3=branch line, 4=mining railroad.

I forgot stating an important detail. This is backwards compatible.
highway=road without road_level=* would default to unclassiffied unknown
road just like now.


09-05-2018 11:15 tarihinde Mateusz Konieczny yazdı:
> 8. May 2018 22:56 by erkinalp9035 at gmail.com
> <mailto:erkinalp9035 at gmail.com>:
>
>     I hereby propose a new tagging scheme. highway=primary ... tertiary
>     deprecated. highway=road road_level=<numeric value> where values
>     correspond to
>
>     0=trunk, 1=primary, 2=secondary, 3=tertiary etc. highway=motorway and
>     other special tags (pedestrian, footway, service, track, path,
>     living_street etc.) would still be used.
>
>
> In case that you are serious: new tagging scheme, especially one
> breaking nearly
>
> all software using OSM data should explain why it is a good idea.
>
>




More information about the Tagging mailing list