[Tagging] access=disabled

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu May 10 13:57:11 UTC 2018

sent from a phone

> On 10. May 2018, at 05:04, Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com> wrote:
> If it's exclusive the normal tagging would be:
> access=no
> disabled=yes

I think capacity tagging would be better (if referring to who can park there), or is really the access restricted? 

> ...to be consistent with other such, like 
> access=no
> bus=yes
> Though I would argue that they all should use the access: prefix in this case
> access=no
> access:disabled=yes

there are some of these
but the mostly used value is “no”, probably this is an inconsistency (not about legal access but about accessibility)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180510/90eea140/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list