[Tagging] access=disabled

Nick Bolten nbolten at gmail.com
Thu May 10 20:23:50 UTC 2018

I agree that capacity:*=yes isn't as information-rich, it's just the
convention listed on the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:capacity. I suppose it could help
communicate different certainties in mapping. There is *some* value in
knowing whether any spaces are available, versus the exact number.

Combining `capacity:disabled=5` with `capacity:disabled:ramp=4` would imply
that 1 disabled parking space doesn't have dedicated room for a van ramp,
if I understand your question right.

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:04 PM Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Nick Bolten <nbolten at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Would it be too deeply nested to have capacity:disabled:ramp=yes/no/#?
> I don't know about being too deeply nested, but if you consider it
> hierarchical I'm not
> happy with the implied semantics that capacity takes a yes/no value.  And
> how do you
> handle it if some of the capacity:disabled=5 have space for a ramp but
> others don't?
> --
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180510/2231736c/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list