[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Fri May 11 14:30:52 UTC 2018


On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 11:57 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2018-05-11 11:36 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk>:
> > 
> > Roads with a width less than 4.5m do not have lane markings. I live
> > in a rural area where there are a lot of such roads and tag these
> > using the width tag. I would only use lanes if there are painted
> > lanes on the road. 
> 
> 
> i.e. you would remove lanes tags in cases where the markings have
> disappeared due to missing maintenance? Would you split roads before
> intersections to add lanes tags close to traffic lights where there
> are markings, so you could remove the lanes tags from the parts where
> there aren't? How long would you say a segment of missing markings
> has to be in order to merit splitting the highway and removing the
> lanes tag?

I am thinking mostly of rural roads that are less than the width to
have lanes, to tag these as having two lanes would be wrong and
misleading as, whilst they have a 60 mph speed limit and that speed is
achievable you will expect to have to slow down and take care when
passing other traffic. You also need to slowdown on bends as visibility
is limited.

They are not advisable as through routes for large vehicles.

It is common for other rural roads, whilst mostly 2 lanes to drop in
width where they encounter restrictions, such as bridges. I map the bridge sections with width.

Phil (trigpoint)



More information about the Tagging mailing list