[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

[Marc Gemis]

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
> For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. Awkward but
> correct.


This is of course incorrect, lanes = 0 (or just do not mention it)
and bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|yes (or designated|designated) and
something similar for backward.

> Op za 12 mei 2018 23:16 schreef Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:
>>
>> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do you keep taggig roads if you know the wiki tells you not to
>>> count cycle lanes?
>>
>>
>> The wiki doesn't mesh with the real world on this issue.
>>
>> How is this lanes=0 and not lanes=2?
>>
>> https://imgur.com/gallery/3C3lHbj
>>
>> How is this lanes=2 and not lanes=4?
>>
>>
>> http://www.oregonlive.com/cycling/index.ssf/2013/10/hawthorne_bridge_gets_new_bike.html
>>
>> What now?
>>
>>
>> https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/gallery/bicycleboulevard_offsetcrossing_rendering/offset_crossings3.jpg
>>
>> I'm sure this fits the wiki's idea of the world and doesn't give cyclists
>> bad lane advice at all.
>>
>>
>> https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a3/76/c2/a376c2693250554476060fc87b00be9f.jpg
>>
>> All involved would probably appreciate advanced warning of this example of
>> what's on the ground being stupid.
>>
>>
>> https://systemicfailure.wordpress.com/2016/09/28/dangerous-double-right-turn-in-fremont/
>>
>> It's not just the US doing stuff like this.
>>
>> https://tinlizzieridesagain.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/100_8603.jpg
>>
>> Christchurch, NZ actually suggests this:
>>
>>
>> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SPHHygdFnRA/UwCbqrLXfoI/AAAAAAAARMA/yPT4ic1zTqw/s1600/christchurchmadjunction.jpg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging