[Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes

Johnparis okosm at johnfreed.com
Sun May 13 18:36:23 UTC 2018


Back to this again, Paul. It is getting tiresome. If you don't like how the
tag is defined, create a new one. Don't vandalize the old one.

The *:lanes suffix is unrelated to the lanes=* tag. Get over it.





On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:26 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1.
>> Awkward but
>> > correct.
>>
>>
>> This is of course incorrect, lanes = 0 (or just do not mention it)
>> and bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|yes (or designated|designated) and
>> something similar for backward.
>
>
> How can there be any bicycle lanes if there are no lanes?  It literally
> doesn't add up.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180513/6d3e5368/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list