[Tagging] tagging arbiters (gone OT)

osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Sat May 19 02:38:41 UTC 2018


It’s not an carto-osm bug, it’s a level lower:

 

https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/issues/230

 

If that ever gets implemented properly, then carto-osm and other data users can make use of it…

 

From: Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> 
Sent: Saturday, 19 May 2018 12:12
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging arbiters (gone OT)

 

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com> wrote:

On 13/05/2018 22:34, Kevin Kenny wrote:



I've long said that the final arbiters of tagging should be... the people who implement the routers, renderers, navigation systems,. search engines, and so on


No.

We already have the case where Carto-OSM are requesting duplicated tags on ways that are already in relations as they're unwilling/unable to right code that manipulates relation data.

 

Is that a bug in the carto-osm github right now?  Even the Linux kernel killed the ext filesystem dinosaur once ext4 became a thing, and by then it already overstayed it's welcome once ext2 was widespread.  Killing the route-refs-on-ways dinosaur is long overdue. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180519/ce3e4dfc/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list