[Tagging] opening_hours:sign=no - RFC
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed May 23 08:29:59 UTC 2018
23. May 2018 07:15 by 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>:
> > On 23/05/18 16:25, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> >
>>
>>
>>
>> 22. May 2018 23:03 by >> 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>> :
>>
>>
>>> On 23/05/18 07:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/opening_hours:sign%3Dno <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/opening_hours:sign%3Dno>
>>>>
>>>> All comments are welcomed!
>>>
>>> Could not this information be included in the note tag?
>>
>> My entire motivation for making this tag is to record this data
>>
>> in machine-readable form. I want to make my detector of things to survey to stop suggesting opening hours that are not worth surveying.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposal page links to already implemented and used code.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be impossible with note field,
>>
>> without forcing all mappers to use
>>
>>
>> specific phrase to record it (in one language across the world),
>>
>> what is undesirable.
>>
> Ok, that is a fine reason. Might want to make that clear on the proposal page?
I added more explicit note why new tag is preferred over note.
> What about similar tags for missing address signs?
If one needs it something similar may be also used.
addr:housenumber:sign=no? addr:sign = no?
But I would leave it for somebody who needs this tag.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180523/53ad92e0/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list