[Tagging] opening_hours:sign=no - RFC

[Mateusz Konieczny]

23. May 2018 07:15 by 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>:


>         > On 23/05/18 16:25, Mateusz Konieczny      wrote:
>     >     
>>             
>>       
>>       
>>       22. May 2018 23:03 by >> 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>> :
>>       
>>       
>>> On 23/05/18        07:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:        
>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/opening_hours:sign%3Dno <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/opening_hours:sign%3Dno>
>>>>           
>>>>           All comments are welcomed!
>>>         
>>>         Could not this information be included in the note tag?
>>       
>> My entire motivation for making this tag is to record this data
>>       
>>  in machine-readable form. I want  to make my detector of        things to survey to stop suggesting opening hours that are not        worth surveying.
>>       
>>
>>       
>>       
>> Proposal page links to already implemented and used code.
>>       
>>
>>       
>>       
>> It would be impossible with note field,
>>       
>> without forcing all mappers to use 
>>       
>>       
>> specific phrase to record it (in one language across the        world),
>>       
>> what is undesirable.
>>     
>     Ok, that is a fine reason. Might want to make that clear on the    proposal page?  

 

I added more explicit note why new tag is preferred over note. 





> What about similar tags for missing address signs? 

 

If one needs it something similar may be also used.

addr:housenumber:sign=no? addr:sign = no? 


But I would leave it for somebody who needs this tag.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180523/53ad92e0/attachment.html>