[Tagging] roundtrip

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Sat May 26 11:30:34 UTC 2018


I'm good with that if there is no major objection.

2018-05-26 12:45 GMT+02:00 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:

> For validation purposes it would be interesting to know if the ways in the
> route relation are supposed to form a closed loop. Can we adopt
> closed_loop=yes for that use case?
>
> Polyglot
>
> 2018-05-26 12:10 GMT+02:00 Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>:
>
>> I would like to wrap this up, without a formal proposal process, if there
>> is no fundamental objection.
>> Afterwards, I will announce it in the Dutch community and arrange the
>> re-tagging of existing usage.
>>
>> I suggest:
>>
>> * Update the wiki page for key: roundtrip, to reflect the correct
>> meaning, and advize to use circular_route=yes or route:circular=yes
>> (2Bdecided). Whether or not the redefined key:roundtrip is still useful or
>> should be deprecated, can be decided later. It does not matter to me, at
>> this point.
>>
>> * Add a page for the new key:circular_route=yes|no or
>> route:circular=yes|no, to indicate that a route is to be regarded as
>> circular/linear (no matter if it's a closed route on the map or not).
>>
>> If other route variants are foreseen, maybe route:circular=yes|no is
>> better?
>>
>> Details about context and use cases can be added and modified through the
>> talk-pages.
>>
>> Allright?
>>
>> 2018-05-25 23:46 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> On 25/05/18 21:31, Peter Elderson wrote:
>>>
>>> It's an example. But we are not alone...
>>>
>>>
>>> Same in Sydney Australia - billed on entry and exit points .. not on how
>>> long you have been inside the  transport system system.
>>> Some 'homeless' use it as a warm dry resting place, doing long round
>>> trips.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2018-05-25 12:33 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> 2018-05-25 12:29 GMT+02:00 Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> How would that be applicable in Nederland, where PT uses one type of
>>>>> chipcard for all voyages and payment is based on distance travelled between
>>>>> check-in and check-out, no matter the route or vehicle?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> isn't this offtopic? Why would we care if the Dutch PT tariffing can
>>>> deal with roundtrips or not?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vr gr Peter Elderson
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vr gr Peter Elderson
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>


-- 
Vr gr Peter Elderson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180526/d3559f50/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list