[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Mapping disputed boundaries

[Johnparis]

Based on the feedback I have received so far, I plan to refine the Proposed
Feature. I still welcome comments during this period, but I think the
revised version will go a long way to resolving the problems we currently
face. (For a hint, see my latest remarks on the Talk page of the proposal.)

I hope to have the revised version (with examples) ready by the weekend.

John


On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:04 PM Johnparis <okosm at johnfreed.com> wrote:

> Thanks for that, Martin. This is explicitly covered in the proposal under
> the List of Claiming Entities. The criteria for joining the list are
> crucial to implementation of the proposal.
>
> Palestine is on the list. Kurdistan is not. But once again, it's the
> criteria that count.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:46 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <
> dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> what about observers to the UN, e.g. Palestine?
>>
>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_observers
>>
>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Palestine
>>
>> Or Kurdistan, which doesn’t exist as a country, but there is a people and
>> claims for a country (verifiability of claimed borders could well be an
>> issue here)
>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdistan
>>
>> Cheers, Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181128/29bcdc4b/attachment.html>