[Tagging] My "weirdly unnatural aversion to relations"

Richard ricoz.osm at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 17:27:46 UTC 2018

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:01:17PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:

> > I can give you a case that is more complicated.  The University of Edinburgh.  As well as a main>  campus, and a subsidiary mini-campus,  it has individual buildings scattered all around the city.> It could be mapped as a multipolygon but it would be a lot of work.  Imagine using a multipolygon>  natural=wood to handle many individual, widely-spaced trees by poking lots ofi rregular, large holes>  in it where trees aren't.
> > See > https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps <https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps>>   And note that what you get there is the first of five tabs> covering different agglomerations of buildings.
> >
> > I think the only feasible way of handling this would be a site relation. Maybe you can think of a better> way of handling it.
> Why selecting buildings and tagging them to site relation is easier than selecting building and adding them to  a multipolygon realation? 

looks like abuse of multipolygon relation to me.


More information about the Tagging mailing list