[Tagging] My "weirdly unnatural aversion to relations"
ricoz.osm at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 17:27:46 UTC 2018
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:01:17PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > I can give you a case that is more complicated. The University of Edinburgh. As well as a main> campus, and a subsidiary mini-campus, it has individual buildings scattered all around the city.> It could be mapped as a multipolygon but it would be a lot of work. Imagine using a multipolygon> natural=wood to handle many individual, widely-spaced trees by poking lots ofi rregular, large holes> in it where trees aren't.
> > See > https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps <https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps>> And note that what you get there is the first of five tabs> covering different agglomerations of buildings.
> > I think the only feasible way of handling this would be a site relation. Maybe you can think of a better> way of handling it.
> Why selecting buildings and tagging them to site relation is easier than selecting building and adding them to a multipolygon realation?
looks like abuse of multipolygon relation to me.
More information about the Tagging