[Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Oct 7 12:46:01 UTC 2018


I found (again) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site>and I am trying to improve it.
"multiple cave entrances of a single cave" sounds like a good example of a valid use 
but http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html?zoom=16&lat=50.67804&lon=7.22231&layers=B0000FT&detail=3 <http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html?zoom=16&lat=50.67804&lon=7.22231&layers=B0000FT&detail=3> is not loading properly for me.
Can you link directly OSM relation of this object?

2. Oct 2018 18:01 by marc.gemis at gmail.com <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>:


> This relation combines a number of cave entrances the belong to the
> same system that is apparantly protected:
> http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html?zoom=16&lat=50.67804&lon=7.22231&layers=B0000FT&detail=3 <http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html?zoom=16&lat=50.67804&lon=7.22231&layers=B0000FT&detail=3>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:08 PM Mateusz Konieczny
> <> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> > wrote:
>>
>> 2. Październik 2018 12:36 od >> marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com <mailto:marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com>>> :
>>
>> Le 02. 10. 18 à 11:46, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit :
>> > Can you link this case if that is more complicated?
>> it's a fictional example. ok not the better one.
>>
>> take again the example you cut in the initial message:
>> a wind turbin site with a few turbines represented by a few nodes
>> I hope your solution is not to make a way for each wind turbine
>> to be able to add in into a multipolygon to describe the site.
>> it would not make much sense to make a polygon encompassing all objects
>> between the wind turbines and describe that the whole thing is a wind site
>>
>>
>>  I agree that for wind turbines multipolygon may not be feasible.
>>
>>
>> So far it is the only known to me case where site relation maybe is useful
>>
>> (I have no experience with features like wind turbine farms so it is hard
>>
>> for me to judge this case - that is why I skipped it).
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181007/f664dc7f/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list