[Tagging] mechanical edit on iD request (was: Traffic_sign discussion)

Yves yvecai at mailbox.org
Thu Oct 11 09:51:01 UTC 2018

If there is an issue with something merged too fast into iD, I guess that the devs could welcome a revert.

Le 11 octobre 2018 11:19:33 GMT+02:00, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> a écrit :
>Le 10. 10. 18 à 21:22, yo paseopor a écrit :
>> avoid problems with new iD editor as an agreement on tagging list"
>> mechanical edit
>this is the main problem with the current way of doing things:
>a dev has a problem and it turns into a hidden mass edit, poorly 
>documented compared to community habits and therefore the only goal 
>seems to be to be able to close a ticket within the week.
>for my part I no longer participate in these discussions given the 
>strange conception of the community (I still saw it with the proposal
>the permit. the propal was still under discussion, the meaning not yet 
>finalized that it was already merged in iD... so what is the point of 
>continuing to discuss the problem if the dev is above the community?)
>I would be delighted if this message could be used to put an end to
>problem so that we can improve the quality even if it will sometimes 
>take more time than a week.
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181011/3d697199/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list