[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)
graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 22:13:09 UTC 2018
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 07:37, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25/10/18 07:51, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:19 PM Allan Mustard <allan at mustard.net> wrote:
>>> Please do continue to comment and to offer suggestions, and to pose
>> This is pretty much based on gut feelings and may be partially or
>> completely wrong...
>> I don't think "amenity" is a suitable tag for a consulate. Amenities are
>> parks, or toilets, or similar.
>> "Should we go to the park or the consulate for a picnic today?" "I'm
>> busting for a crap, where's the
>> nearest consulate?" And I'm damned sure an embassy isn't an amenity (I'm
>> not even sure, in these
>> days of telecommunications, if it serves any purpose other than housing
>> spies, but if heads of state
>> do still use embassies for formal communication between governments
>> they're definitely not
>> I'm not going to worry too much about that particular tagging.
> 'amenity=*' is so overloaded in OSM (amenity=prison? Really?) that it can't
> possibly get any worse.
> Since I already have to account for a great many different sorts of cases
> when processing 'amenity=*' for rendering or analysis, one more would be
> lost in the noise. I tend to think of OSM's 'amenity' as having a meaning
> not too far removed from 'thing'.
> I think of it as the miscellaneous folder of OSM, if it cannot fit
> anywhere else it goes in here. The 'I give up' option.
Just had a thought :-)
Would this work under the landuse=government / civic_admin / public_admin
that was being discussed t'other day?
Maybe something like:
government=diplomatic (rendering with the current "embassy" flag)
diplomatic=embassy / consulate etc
services=visa; passport etc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging