[Tagging] unmarked crossing, tactile paving, lowered kerbs / was: 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

[Peter Elderson]

I would not tag that as a crossing for pedestrians at all.

Mvg Peter Elderson

> Op 27 okt. 2018 om 00:14 heeft Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 01:01, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org> wrote:
>> On 26.10.2018 16:41, Robert Skedgell wrote:
>> > On 26/10/18 11:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>> >> Tagging "unmarked crossings" does not make sense for me. An unmarked
>> >> crossing is defined in OSM by a road and a footway sharing a node, there
>> >> is no need for a tag here, as there is nothing special.
>> > 
>> > An unmarked crossing may have no road markings or signs, but if there is
>> > tactile paving and/or a raised/lowered/flush kerb on the footway
>> > (sidewalk), how else would one tag it?
> 
> So how would you tag this situation:  https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.0707782,153.4362109,3a,75y,140.17h,73.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D0bHjLjjqqe1rrdNWfLu94g%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D296.4197%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
> 
> There is a footpath along the side of the road, which drops to road level via a lowered kerb, to meet up with another lowered kerb on the other side of the road. There are no signs or markings of any sort.
> 
> I map them as crossing=unmarked
> 
> Any other suggestions?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20181027/bc54020a/attachment.html>