[Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?
bkil.hu+Aq at gmail.com
Mon Oct 29 21:28:07 UTC 2018
I use commercial and retail landuse a lot. If you plan to do some
refactoring, please consider that a map is most informative if it has
distinct colours. if we applied landuse=residential on hotels, it
would blend in with other houses. To me, mapping non-housing areas
where some kind of commercial activities are taking place in a
different value is a bonus. However, we probably shouldn't have more
than a handful of colors inside the same city center, maybe 4 tops.
Also, has anybody got a rule of thumb when to map a multi-use area as
retail considering that it is common to see shops and cafes on the
first floor of tall buildings?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:33 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
<graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 23:23, SelfishSeahorse <selfishseahorse at gmail.com> wrote:
>> - Hotels are more about services than sale, so i wouldn't use
>> landuse=retail for them. Maybe landuse=residential?
> I think that one would depend on what sort of hotel we're talking about?
> Is it a place to stay: tourism=accommodation, which would / could be =residential,
> or a place to get a cold beer: amenity=pub, which I think would still be =retail?
>> - Cinemas: What about landuse=leisure?
> There's probably a good case for landuse=leisure, but I think you'll probably get a few arguments against as well!
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging