[Tagging] Is waterway=riverbank an 'Old scheme' ?

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 13:52:03 UTC 2018

sent from a phone

> On 6. Sep 2018, at 15:37, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org> wrote:
> well it is certainly the _older_ scheme than natural=water + water=river, insofar the statement is not wrong. The wiki page for 'riverbank' says, it "remains in widespread use and is still preferred by some mappers." I.e. 279K vs. 19K for water=river.

according to tag history the older scheme grows at least at the same speed as the newer alternative.


More information about the Tagging mailing list