[Tagging] Why isn't the amenity=parking object part of the relation ?

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Sep 15 09:17:25 UTC 2018

sent from a phone

> On 15. Sep 2018, at 11:00, OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238eee at gmx.com> wrote:
> Do you mean you use plain polygons, and let data consumer derive relation observing the parking space polygon is situated within the geo boundaries of an amenity parking polygon ?
> Or do you mean you use multi-polygon relations. [1]

there is no difference, polygons or multipolygons are the same with regard to the question at hand. I don’t see the need for a grouping relation, neither by us nor by downstream data consumers, but you could certainly create them automatically from polygons and the things inside.

More information about the Tagging mailing list