[Tagging] Area of Firestations / Area of Ambulancestations

[Colin Smale]

What about landuse=ambulance_station on the area? What would the landuse
be otherwise?

Asking for a friend... 

On 2018-09-21 10:47, dktue wrote:

> How about ambulance stations?
> 
> Should we tag the area with emergency=ambulance_station and the building with building=ambulance_station?
> 
> dktue
> 
> Am 21.09.2018 um 03:23 schrieb Mike H: 
> I've only mapped one station like this so far, but the area is actually rendered on the map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616033018 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:43 AM Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org> wrote: Yes of course, I've been doing this for long already.
> 
> On 20.09.2018 14:06, Philip Barnes wrote:
>> Yes, just go for it. Makes perfect sense.
>> 
>> Phil (trigpoint)
>> 
>> On 20 September 2018 12:56:03 BST, dktue <email at daniel-korn.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I love how we map areas with amenity=school and buildings inside of it
>> with building=school. The same goes for amenity=hospital and
>> building=hospital.
>> 
>> What I'd like to have is the same schema for firestations: They often
>> have a large area and one or multiple buildings on it.
>> 
>> Should I go with amenity=fire_station for the area and
>> building=fire_station for the buildings inside of it?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> dktue
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20180921/7789f9db/attachment.html>