[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 108, Issue 162
kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com
Fri Sep 28 19:41:13 UTC 2018
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:38 AM Dave Swarthout <daveswarthout at gmail.com> wrote:
> The discussion about the definition of "reach" is interesting but IMO it's slightly off topic. Perhaps, because of those differences in its interpretation, we would be best served by not using the term at all.
Except that I would like to see flowlines in the US tagged with their
'reach code', which is a numeric identifier in NHD and other sources
that is intended to serve as permanent idenfitication for a particular
waterway. Those cross reference to enough places that carrying the
information is useful.
More information about the Tagging