[Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- Landcover Artificial

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Apr 10 20:11:09 UTC 2019


As expressed in earlier discussion I see little value in such unspecific value.

It will be more confusing to mappers and this data will not help in further mapping.
I have similar opinion about two other related proposals.

Apr 6, 2019, 11:46 AM by lorenzostucchi95 at outlook.it:

> Dear all, 
>
> After the proposal of some weeks ago about the deforestation, we thought about a proposal of 3 different tag that can be useful to tag this change.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process/Landcover_Artificial <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process/Landcover_Artificial>>  At this page the second proposal.
>
> Any comment is well accepted and welcomed, to keep track of all the suggestion, please add your comment on the discussion of the wiki page. I will also read all the wiki, but the other people of the group is more easy that they read the wiki page.
>
> Thanks to all,
> Best Regards,
> Lorenzo Stucchi
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190410/35a39248/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list