[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Key:golf_cart
pla16021 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 15:56:41 UTC 2019
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 16:32, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> > On 10. Apr 2019, at 14:28, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > People must obtain and display permits
> > on their carts to use the paths. Accordingly, somebody has tagged
> several footpaths there
> > with golf_cart=permissive.
> that’s definitely not „permissive“,
I agree. But I didn't tag it, I just pointed out how it had been tagged.
> it’s either „yes“, „designated“ or maybe „private“ (if you need a
> „special“ permission the standard tag is private). If you need a general
> license for golf carts, tagging it would be like tagging that you need a
> driving permit to drive a car.
It is along the lines of a driving licence, but not exactly the same (as I
understand it). Which
means it should probably be access=permit (discussed here a few months ago).
It's not like access for cars (you're in a car, you have a driving licence,
access is permitted). It's
not like access for bicycles (you're on a bicycle, you don't need a
licence, access is permitted).
You can drive a golf cart along what are essentially wide footpaths IF you
have a permit. You
can't drive to the city in a low-loader ferrying a golf cart, unload the
golf cart and just drive it
along those paths with impunity, you have to get a permit or risk a fine.
For more info, follow the links I gave previously.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging