[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch
joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Sun Apr 14 13:46:13 UTC 2019
Martin, do you have a suggestion for a different key or value for this tag?
I mentioned "tourism=camp_pitch" or "amenity=camp_pitch" above, but I
think this could cause people to start using this as a stand-alone
feature, perhaps for small or remote campsites that have only one
pitch. However, I don't think this would be good. Mappers should use
the established tag "tourism=camp_site" to map the outline of the
whole camping area, whether it is for 1 tent or 1000.
By using a different key, like "camp_site=*", this is more clearly a
"sub-feature" of tourism=camp_site
On 4/14/19, Sven Geggus <lists at fuchsschwanzdomain.de> wrote:
> Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would not say it is used frequently, we have 100.000 camp sites tagged,
>> and only 7000 pitches with this tag
> Given the fact, that about half of them do not have more tags than name
> (about a quarter lack even name) this ratio is not all that bad.
> .. this message has been created using an outdated OS (UNIX-like) with an
> outdated mail- or newsreader (text-only) :-P
> /me is giggls at ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Tagging