[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Apr 14 19:35:18 UTC 2019



sent from a phone

> On 14. Apr 2019, at 18:36, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> one of the problems is that each key has its own logic
> a part of a amenity=building is building:part=*
> a part of the amenity=parking is amenity=parking_space
> a part of a leisure=sports_centre is leisure=pitch unless it is water 
> then it is leisure=swimming_pool
> 
> new keys deserve to have some consistency.
> e.g. :part if the part does not have a name in itself


I don’t follow this, a part of a park is a park:part (bench, tree etc)? A part of a city? This would be ridiculous or ambiguous or arbitrary most of the time, but for buildings it works well, also if the part has its own name.

Cheers, Martin 


More information about the Tagging mailing list