[Tagging] documenting cycleway=crossing

marc marc marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com
Tue Apr 16 13:47:05 UTC 2019

Le 16.04.19 à 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit :
> Apr 16, 2019, 2:50 PM by marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com:
>      > highway=path/highway=footway that has bicycle=yes/bicycle=designated.
>     highway=path + path=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate
>     or highway=footway + footway=crossing + bicycle=yes|designate
>     is not enought ?
> It is enough, I rephrased it. Hopefully it is now more redable
> direct link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing
> edit: 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Acycleway%3Dcrossing&type=revision&diff=1843156&oldid=1843110

yes it's more redable, but i still find it strange.
I think this tag only makes sense when one of these
two ways crosses a road :
highway=path|footway + cycleway=*

if there is no cycleway=* before the crossing,
it is normal that the crossing way does not have a cycleway
e.g. a highway=path + cycleway=no + bicycle=yes crossing a road
must not have a cycleway=crossing. no cycleway exist there.

More information about the Tagging mailing list