[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Camp_site=camp_pitch

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Apr 17 23:49:05 UTC 2019

sent from a phone

> On 17. Apr 2019, at 11:34, Sven Geggus <lists at fuchsschwanzdomain.de> wrote:
> Your suggestion would not allow for tagging a site like this:
> tourism=camp_site
> camp_site=camp_pitch

This combination, with the semantics you have in mind, on the same object, would not be possible, on the other hand there would not be much need for mapping individual pitches if the whole site is just one “pitch” (not sure the word pitch applies in this case). 

And you may eventually be able to keep the exact same tagging but with different intended semantics (and basically the same meaning for the people who use the map): camp_pitch as subtype of camp site, not as a pitch object like tourism=camp_pitch

There are also other ways to express similar information. “capacity” is not very diffuse yet (3000), but seems suitable to get an idea how many fellow campers might be awaiting you, and is universally applicable.

Cheers, Martin 

More information about the Tagging mailing list