[Tagging] Road hierarchy
f at zz.de
Sun Aug 4 09:57:19 UTC 2019
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 12:46:05PM +0300, Tomas Straupis wrote:
> Now I would like to skip road C at small scale, but leave A, because I
> want to leave B.
> Can we agree on some scheme to tag this (do data augmentation), so
> that less people doing cartography stuff have to resort to heavy
> generalisation operation such as road pruning?
When you honestly look at roads something like a correct hierarchy
This is why i get to the point "is it a public road" and "a public
road cant be service". If we agree on this you can as some zoom scale
drop service and track.
Because a public road does not branch of a private road. There is
So getting back to your example:
If B is a public road A cant be private property and thus not be
a service. If B is a track A can be a service because both
of them share the concept of not beeing for the general public.
Or vice versa. If you make A a service B cant be a public road.
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Tagging