[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

[Joseph Eisenberg]

I didn’t invent the tag, it’s already been used several hundred times.

I suppose the idea was “scout (camp) = yes/no” - its a property that
describes the type of camp as “scout”. It could be used with access = yes
or = private depending on the camp.

There is also leisure=summer_camp which might be used with scout=yes, but
it’s not totally clear when to use that tag instead of tourism=camp_site.

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:32 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 11:39, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> scout=yes/no
>>
>
> I was wondering what "scout" referred to, till I looked at the page & saw
> reference to Girl Scouts etc!
>
> This should possibly be scout*s*=yes/no ?
>
> (Although I have seen references out here to non-Scouting people camping
> in Scout campgrounds while they're not being used by Scouts, so it's
> apparently not an exclusive tag?)
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190823/3b154030/attachment.html>