[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

Kevin Kenny kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com
Fri Dec 6 18:38:03 UTC 2019


On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:29 PM Janko Mihelić <janjko at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the "forward" and "backward" don't belong in a role of a relation. Oneway=yes on a way should be enough. In the Wiki discussion it is said that if there is one little "oneway" way in a big branch, then all the ways in a branch should be checked to see if the whole branch is oneway. But that means we are doing the work of a router directly in the tags.

What about the case where it's perfectly right and proper to walk the
way in either direction, but the route is signed in only one
direction? Or if the route places foot traffic on a one way street
against the direction of motor traffic? I have encountered a few of
both scenarios.



More information about the Tagging mailing list