[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Dec 7 12:21:36 UTC 2019


There are some hiking routes
signposted with allowing travel in one
direction and forbidding in the opposite.

7 Dec 2019, 13:04 by pelderson at gmail.com:

> Cannot be legal for a pedestrian route, I think. So practical.
>
> Mvg Peter Elderson
>
>> Op 7 dec. 2019 om 10:53 heeft Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> 
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 7. Dec 2019, at 04:36, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If oneway=yes is placed on a route relation then any excursions and appropriate approaches will have to be separate relations.
>>>
>>
>>
>> is it a legal restriction or a practical one if placed on a route relation?
>>
>>
>> Cheers Martin 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191207/456e52a1/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list