[Tagging] Route node roles - was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

[s8evq]

On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 10:30:37 +1100, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'd suggest making it clear that that table is currently for way 
> > members only - it doesn't mention node members (start, end, marker, 
> > etc.).  This may be deliberate, or you just haven't expanded it yet, 
> > but I'd definitely mention node members.
> 
> For nodes .. think the roles of ways should be done first, but some 
> thoughts for later proposal/s.
> 
> Are they necessary?
> 

In my limited experience mapping hiking routes, I have not yet come across any real use for nodes in hiking relations, but I'm curious if other people have good uses. 
As far as I know, there is also not much documented in the wiki on the topic of nodes in hiking/cycling relations.