[Tagging] Route node roles - was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

[Peter Elderson]

To sum up, checkpoints and trailheads deserve to be mapped. Once they are
features mapped and tagged as nodes, they can be rendered, searched and
used as POIs.
Questions:
Is it useful to include them as node members in the hiking route
relation(s) or is the spatial relationship enough?
If included, do they need a member role?
If so, would "checkpoint" and "trailhead" be acceptable and useful role
values?
Would it be acceptable/useful for mappers to include a node in a route
relation with a "checkpoint" role without any tagging?

Fr gr Peter Elderson

> __________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191210/411d0605/attachment.html>