[Tagging] Route node roles - was Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Tue Dec 10 06:54:30 UTC 2019

To sum up, checkpoints and trailheads deserve to be mapped. Once they are
features mapped and tagged as nodes, they can be rendered, searched and
used as POIs.
Is it useful to include them as node members in the hiking route
relation(s) or is the spatial relationship enough?
If included, do they need a member role?
If so, would "checkpoint" and "trailhead" be acceptable and useful role
Would it be acceptable/useful for mappers to include a node in a route
relation with a "checkpoint" role without any tagging?

Fr gr Peter Elderson

> __________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191210/411d0605/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list