[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - hiking_trail_relation_roles

[John Willis]

> On Dec 9, 2019, at 6:36 AM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> individual ways that have the direction, not the entire relation. 

some routes (made of many overlapping pieces of trail) are considered ascents and decents. the named “trail" is made of the ascent route and descent route. 

tagging Mt fuji is the opposite of a trail hundreds or thousands of Km long - it’s a few routes less than 10 KM long used by thousands of people every day of the season. 

http://www.fujisan-climb.jp/en/m8bimq0000001afw-img/Fuji_Climbing_Map_L.jpg <http://www.fujisan-climb.jp/en/m8bimq0000001afw-img/Fuji_Climbing_Map_L.jpg>

The colors are the different trails. the dashed lines are the descent routes. there are overlapping ascent and decent routes from different trails (subashiri &  Yoshida between the summit and 8th station) and shared paths/tracks as well. 

it would be nice to be able to tag the ascent/descent/both. 

I mentioned this in the comments, but the answer didn’t seem to address the issue directly. 

also - does the relation need intersection/junction nodes? 

also also - links?

Javbw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191212/2153c055/attachment.html>