[Tagging] footway=crossing in detailed tagging

[Markus]

On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 23:06, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Not unclear at all.
>
> The only thing that both the foot-cycle crossing and the foot-cycle sidepath are tagged as single ways (highway=path, bicycle=designated, foot=designated, segregated=yes).
> And there are hundreds of these around the city.
> So "my" tagging ignores the relative positions of foot and cycle lanes, and there is only one kerb on each side of the crossing. The crossing way extends to the centre line of the sidepath way, the kerb is on the crossing way.

In both examples, the cycleway is physically separated from the
footway by a row of trees except at the crossing. Therefore mapping
them as separate ways makes sense.

Regards

Markus