[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 52 Co-ordinate sets vs. background informations = ODbL vs. CC

[Sergio Manzi]

I strongly dissent with the tone of your mail.

Everybody, not only you and the most vocifeferous ones, have the right to express their opinion.

You can dissent, but the tone of your mail is definitely rude and divisive.

Think twice.

Regards,

Sergio


On 2019-02-14 12:45, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 09:13, Ulrich Lamm <ulamm.brem at t-online.de <mailto:ulamm.brem at t-online.de>> wrote:
>
>     Am 12.02.2019 um 05:59 schrieb tagging-request at openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging-request at openstreetmap.org>:
>
>     Rules according to the interests of commercial exploiters make our mapping an unpaid labour for some landlords. 
>     That is the opposite of freedom.
>
>
> You have the freedom not to map.  Nobody is forcing you to participate in a project that you
> fundamentally disagree with.
>
> You have the freedom to set up your own alternative to OSM with your own rules about permissible
> imports.  If you can justify it within your own tortured logic about copyright, you can even use the
> OSM database as a foundation for your efforts.
>
> The rest of us have the freedom to set mail filters so your messages go straight to the bit
> bucket, unread.  I don't know about others, but that option looks increasingly tempting to me.
>
> -- 
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190214/f7a37ad4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190214/f7a37ad4/attachment-0001.bin>