[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 14. Feb 2019, at 19:51, Tobias Zwick <osm at westnordost.de> wrote:
> 
> The reason for it being (not) accessible is secondary,


if the reason is not of legal nature, it is subjective and may be felt differently by different people, that’s why we don’t do it.

The Hamburg example of the connection road in an area which is separated for pedestrians by a barrier, might eventually be implicitly forbidden (because pedestrians must cross at intersections if there are, and must not climb over guard rails), although one might argue that someone carrying a big box or pushing a wheelbarrow would still have to use the road (unless the sidewalks are sufficiently spacious so she doesn’t create problems).

Gruß, Martin