[Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels
Dave Swarthout
daveswarthout at gmail.com
Sat Feb 16 01:18:46 UTC 2019
"Direction of flow" isn't quite right for a canoe route that crosses a
lake. Also, it would be rare but not impossible, for a canoe route to move
against the flow when traversing a stream. But, unless someone can think of
a better way to word this, I'm okay with what's there. Such refinements can
be made in the route relation perhaps. Direction "forward" or "backward"
come to mind although I've never used them for a canoe route myself. The
only canoe route I've ever mapped can be traveled in either direction if
one wishes.
Dave
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 5:49 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 00:12, Fernando Trebien <fernando.trebien at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> For well-known partially unmarked shipping routes, I think there would
>> be no problem lifting the requirement of navigation marks. But I'm not
>> sure if this applies to canoe routes, which are usually not marked.
>> I'm neither a sailor nor a native English speaker, so I think I'd
>> better leave this decision to those experienced in marine navigation.
>>
>
> Going off my own knowledge of small craft, along with Dave & Kevin's canoe
> experience :-), I've edited the page as discussed above
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dfairway
>
> Are we all happy with that?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
--
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190216/ac7a5c46/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list